While preparing for our discussion on A Little Life for Wednesday, conversation shifted to the topic of trigger warnings. Do you think they’re necessary? If so, when and where?
There are so many aspects to this topic that it’s hard to be definitive about it. I think they can serve a very important purpose as guidelines for age-appropriate material but when used as a means to deter people from reading things just because you disagree with them, then no, not good.
Perhaps we should define trigger warnings. Are we talking about topics that trigger an emotional response? Something that reminds us of a difficult time? Something that triggers PTSD? There’s a big difference between avoiding topics that we don’t like and avoiding topics that actually trigger a severe emotional response.
I totally agree, and I think that’s one of the biggest problems with this issue in general. The term “triggers” is used pretty loosey-goosey these days. Let’s see what we can find in the way of a definition. “[Trigger warnings] are designed to prevent people who have an extremely strong and damaging emotional response (for example, post-traumatic flashbacks or urges to harm themselves) to certain subjects from encountering them unaware.” (Geek Feminism Wiki) Does that sound like a fair definition, or would you make some changes?
It does sound like a fair definition, but I think it can be difficult to peg down what acts as a trigger. When I think of those kinds of reactions, something as simple as seemingly benign descriptions (of a landscape, a structure, a character’s appearance) could bring everything back. It’s compassionate and thoughtful for readers/bloggers to mention potential triggers they notice (I did this with Rebecca Rasmussen’s Evergreen because I know a number of fellow preemie moms read my blog) but I don’t think it’s possible to think of all of them, since traumatic experiences are as varied and personal as the triggers that could cause those “fight or flight” responses.
It’s difficult for me to make a blanket statement about trigger warnings, since I think they can take on different forms and can be useful in certain situations. When giving recommendations, I do think it’s important to let readers know if there is material people may find triggering. But when we get into the territory of labeling books, either themselves or on college syllabi, I start to get twitchy. I think the warnings serve a purpose and I’m lucky not to have anything that traumatic in my past, but I think we’re walking a fine line when we start to encourage people to not read something—even if it’s for a legitimate reason.
Agreed. The word ‘label’ is the one that makes me nervous, mostly because I think of Tipper Gore and her legislation to get music labelled for violence and/or explicit lyrics. As an advisement, they can be helpful. I’m not a fan of graphic violence so knowing that a novel has a great deal of blood and gore does go a long way in helping me decide if I want to read it. In that way, it’s a service and I appreciate it.
This is where book blogs and reviews on Goodreads and Amazon play an important and useful role. People are very good about sharing personalized reactions on what they read. A quick glance through the reviews can really help.
This is what I was thinking. There’s definitely a difference between triggering PTSD and simply not liking something, but I think all readers (if they plan on having good reading experiences) should do a little research before picking up a book.
Agreed. If something is going to cause emotional harm or pain that is very different than me saying I don’t like violence. I’ll get queasy but is that really a trigger or simply a reaction? I almost feel as if this could go around and around…
The key to the definition for me is the trauma. If you get queasy and have a physical reaction because you’re re-experiencing a past trauma, that’s different from just not liking violence and I think it’s a more valid reason for skipping out on a book. Still, like Monika said earlier, there are so many different things that can act as triggers for similar trauma that it’s not as simple as assuming all survivors should avoid the same books for the same reasons.
“The kinds of suffering typically imaged and experienced in the white western male realm – war, intra-male violence – are standard. Traumas that impact women, people of color, LGBT people, the mentally ill and other groups whose collective lives far outnumber those most often canonized in the American or European classroom are set apart as different, as particularly traumatizing. Trigger warnings imply that our experiences are so unusual the pages detailing our lives can only be turned while wearing kid gloves.” — Jill Filipovic
I could have quoted almost all of Jill Filipovic’s article, but I think this is one of my biggest concerns. As soon as I read it, I started thinking about books I’ve read recently that could be considered triggering, and most are far outside the white western male realm: The Shore, An Untamed State, Ruby, A Little Life. I’d hate to see those novels set aside for other stories.
I love her point here, it’s very empowering in that it allows for traumatic experiences to simply be. There are times when the repercussions seem to take over, but that’s not going to be all of the time. And look at the synopses of these titles. A Little Life includes words and phrases such as unspeakable childhood, trauma, addiction, dark. Ruby: devastating violence of her girlhood, survive her memories. The Shore: abusive home, methamphetamine ravages their family. An Untamed State: a woman kidnapped for ransom, endure the torments of a man. I think there are enough clues here for someone who is currently and actively struggling with the fallout of their own experiences to stop and think, “I need to look into this further before deciding whether or not I can handle this book at this time.”
So, are trigger warnings necessary? My personal answer is…maybe. Like Monika says, we should be able to look at a synopsis and know whether or not a book is one we need to be wary of. We need to know ourselves and not expect others to clear the path ahead of us. Each reader knows what kind of books can cause them distress, but true triggers are harder to nail down. Isn’t it almost impossible to truly label those books?
So, what’s your opinion on trigger warnings? Should they be used in certain situations? Are they necessary to protect readers or do they cause more harm than good?
May 11, 2015 at 3:11 am
Speaking as an author and as a reader I wouldn’t want to see trigger warnings on books. Who would get to decide whether a book should have a warning? I think the onus has to be on the readers who might experience problems – they are likely to know what they need to avoid. Otherwise, we would need to have trigger warning on art exhibitions, films, journalism…
LikeLike
May 11, 2015 at 11:25 am
Yes, good point. Sometimes the very point of art is to raise a difficult issue–take Picasso’s Guernica. Could it have triggered PTSD for a veteran of the First World War? Possibly. But the painting toured the world and brought global attention to the devastation of the Spanish Civil War in the late 1930s. Should it have been censored or labeled? I hope most people would say no.
LikeLike
May 11, 2015 at 3:31 pm
I agree, Clare, which is why I brought up the whole Tipper Gore thing. I don’t think things should be labeled but in reviews or making recommendations it can help people who really have issues with a subject. Beyond that, it makes me uncomfortable.
LikeLike
May 11, 2015 at 4:17 pm
I’m glad you mentioned this distinction again, Catherine, because I was wondering if it got lost in the discussion. I mentioned it above, but I think it can be really important for individuals to let people know if there is potentially triggering material in a book. It’s the idea of blanket labels (either on books or syllabi) that gets me concerned.
LikeLike
May 11, 2015 at 9:10 am
I don’t know of many people who would pick up a book and start reading without at least reading the synopsis of what it is about. I think as long as any potential triggers are included in the summary, that should be enough, or at least it should make you look into other reviews before deciding if that book is for you.
LikeLike
May 11, 2015 at 11:44 am
Right, I mean, there are so many resources to find out about books these days, that if certain triggers are a thing for a specific reader, they have the information available to decided whether or not they should pursue that book, or not.
LikeLike
May 11, 2015 at 11:14 am
Speaking as a former history teacher at the college level, I have grave concerns with trigger warnings on college syllabi (this issue first arose last spring on college campuses in the context of warnings on college course material). A serious study of history includes some enormously difficult topics–slavery, the Holocaust, the rape of women. You can’t “skip” sections of important material because it might be upsetting. I can’t imagine what a completely sanitized college-level course on American history would look like.
As a fiction reader, I agree with Monika’s point that there should be enough clues in the synopsis of a book about the subject matter. A Little Life and An Untamed State are perfect examples: wasn’t it crystal clear that there would be some upsetting material? It was to me. That should be sufficient; I’d hate to see red “trigger warning” banners being placed on books–because, as several of you pointed out very well, great books could be labeled, set aside, or even censored.
LikeLike
May 11, 2015 at 11:42 am
This is a tough topic. I am lucky enough to really have no triggers, and feel I have free reign to read whatever, with little personal fall-out. So with that being said, I feel, for the most part, that the task is on the reader to weed out those books they feel may be triggering for themselves. I don’t think it should be put upon the author, or the publisher, or the review, or whomever to do it. There are enough resources these days to find out just about everything about a book before even reading it. This is where a little personal responsibility is necessary, and it’s up to you to determine if you should read something, or not. Also, how would an author/publisher/review even KNOW what potential triggers could be for people… that’s making A LOT of assumptions, which I personally wouldn’t feel comfortable with.
Lastly, and selfishly, I don’t want spoilers. There are MANY books, where the triggering event is the “twist” or the “big reveal,” and, if when starting the book you’re reading through the lens of “ok this book has a trigger warning for rape,” I think it just takes something away from the reading of the book.
Great topic!
LikeLike
May 11, 2015 at 2:32 pm
I’m coming at this from the perspective of someone who does have some stuff in my past that would be considered “triggers” to some people. But, I STILL end up at the same place as you do. I’ve read a number of books dealing with the topic of my trigger (I hate to even call it a trigger, because it’s not for me, but for lack of a better word) and I don’t shy away from it at all. Nor would I want to. Nor does reading about it cause me to have flashbacks or send me into a huge spiral. However, I understand that my reaction is not the same as everyone else’s who has been in my situation or any other traumatic situation.
I agree that there is usually enough information in the blurb to convey that something traumatic is ahead and broadly what it relates to. And, I think that’s enough. I think this whole trigger warning thing has already spiraled out of hand (certainly with school syllabi)…when and where will it stop? Will we end up putting a “trigger warning” on a book about divorce? A bad breakup?
And, finally, I’m with you on the spoilers. I feel like publishers have been including way too much info in the blurbs lately (not across the board, but in some cases) and some reviews as well.
LikeLike
May 11, 2015 at 4:53 pm
The vibe I get from a trigger warning is that it is intended to be a compassionate “heads-up”. I see it as something to be appreciated whether it’s in a college class, library or a book store. I’m not saying there ought to be a mandate to have them or the labels because the synopsis and research should be sufficient in most cases to inform a concerned reader.
I guess I do my own version of a trigger warning for some of the books I recommend or don’t recommend because of A,B, or C.
And I don’t think necessarily that a book with a trigger warning will suffer not being read. On the contrary, I think it would boost readership. Sort of like a banned book.
LikeLike
May 11, 2015 at 7:40 pm
I think this a topic where definition is key. Some folks talk about trigger warnings and they mean, “it makes me uncomfortable.” I have PTSD from sexual assault and trigger warnings have a very real meaning to me. A key therapy for those of us with PTSD is to come up with a “trigger list.” These are things that can actually “trigger” us into a dissociative state, or, as with me, a full-blown flashback that is frightening for me and scary for other witnesses. It is also highly embarrassing. If you are a casual reader (i.e. you are not forced to read it) then I don’t think a trigger warning is necessary. I feel like it is up to me to research a book before I read it. I do think trigger warnings are essential for young adult literature and high school and college courses. For one, most college students are young and possibly haven’t developed coping skills for a voice to advocate for themselves. Secondly, it is miserable having an assignment and grade attached to something you cannot read. That isn’t to say that the student should get a free pass. I was allowed to read alternate books and watch different movies. As a gender studies minor in college I had to be very vocal about what I could read. So many texts concerned rape. In one class the assignment was to read an essay about sexual assault and write a journal response; instead the professor allowed me to write a journal response about living with PTSD. I understand that some people us “trigger warnings” as a way to get out of work or as a catch-all phrase for feeling disturbed. I assure that PTSD triggers have a chemical and biological response that is terrifying and it never fully goes away. I was triggered once in a psychology class and had a flashback in front of everyone. It was scary and hugely mortifying. Sorry to babble on for so long; but yes, trigger warnings are important in a certain context.
LikeLike
May 11, 2015 at 8:26 pm
I’m glad you’re babbling! On an individual basis, like what you’ve described or a personal book recommendation, it makes perfect sense to me. Most of what I was thinking about in the post were trigger warnings that are applied across the board, either being printed on books or class syllabi…I think I just have a hard time seeing how they would function. Knowing about the trigger list definitely helps sort that out a little more. It does seem like there’s a bit of a catch-22 when it comes to someone younger. If they haven’t sought out treatment or aren’t quite aware of their specific triggers, would warnings be helpful? I suppose if they’re general enough?
LikeLike
May 18, 2015 at 7:23 am
No trigger warnings! I do not need anyone telling me what I should read or not. It interferes with the relationship between the author and her reader. Bad all the way around.
LikeLike