Last week we discussed audiobooks, so this week we thought we’d bring up another divisive topic—short stories.
I don’t need a common theme as far as subject matter or style goes. It’s okay if they’re all completely random that way. For me, the pacing and feel of the collection is most important. I want the pacing to build and build, and then I want either a finish that packs a punch or a finish that seems like a cool down. Either way, I have to be left with a sense of “it is finished.” The Thing About Great White Sharks is a perfect example.
That sense of being “unfinished” is something that I always hated about short stories, but it seems like I can avoid it when reading collections that are a little more out there. It’s easier to accept that there won’t always be an answer. I’m not someone who really enjoys a “slice of life” style story. In such a small space, I need weird. I need off the wall. Give me all the crazy.
See, the same way I love ambiguous endings in novels, part of what I love about short stories is that oftentimes there is a sense of unfinishedness, lets my imagination run wild.
I’ll jump in here as the little kid who wouldn’t try broccoli because “I know I won’t like it.” Aside from school reading I did not read a short story for pleasure until two years ago. My reasoning? They’re short. I need more time to get invested in what I’m reading and I want/need to stay invested and they end too quickly. The entire rhythm of them felt off to me. Then I grew up and read Lorrie Moore’s Bark, Aimee Bender’s The Color Masters and finally George Saunders’ The Tenth of December. He really hooked me. I’m reformed.
I have a thing against short stories. Whenever I see a new collection my first reaction is to think “nahhhhh.” I’ve been proven wrong more times than I can count but still…there’s something that stops me from declaring my love for the short story. I would rather sink into a longer tale. It takes a lot of effort for me to remember characters if I don’t finish a short story in a single sitting. It’s like Catherine mentioned, I liked/need to be invested and the rhythm of short stories is strange to me.
I see a lot of readers comment on whether or not the stories in a collection have a sense of cohesiveness in some way. Is that something you think about? What does it mean to you or, what makes a collection of short stories strong?
For a long time I really resisted short stories because nothing I read really clicked for me, but after a few recent successes (namely Simon Rich’s Spoiled Brats, George Saunders’ Tenth of December and Margaret Atwood’s Stone Mattress) I realized it was the style of short stories that was the problem.. Like Catherine said, most of the stories we read in school just didn’t do it—I need something a little more wild.
You’re on to something here, Shannon. I like oddity and magical realism in my short stories. They need to entirely encapsulate a world to work for me.
See, I was that dorky kid in school that loved everything I read except for Shakespeare and The Scarlet Letter. I mean, Shirley Jackson’s ‘The Lottery’? Charlotte Perkins Gilman’s ‘The Yellow Wallpaper’? What’s wilder than that?
Even an author I love has an uphill climb when it comes to luring me to read a short story collection. I was excited to hear that Nikolas Butler (Shotgun Lovesongs) had a new book out. Then I found out it was short stories. Sigh. I just heard that Adam Johnson (The Orphan Master’s Son) has a new book coming out late this summer. Guess what? It’s short stories! Ugh. I should mention that I have loved some short story collections. But they always take me by surprise and I’m never excited about them in the beginning.
Thinking about school reading, I actually got hooked on Haruki Murakami because of one of his short stories: TV People was in the back of my world lit book in college and I devoured it. Like Shannon, I best enjoy short stories if they’re off the wall and weird, but I do still like to pull out classics at times (Hemingway or Mark Twain) or see what The New Yorker is offering.
Agreed, I can devour a collection of short horror stories with complete weirdness or I can sit down with some classic Twain and love on that too. The best part of short stories for me is the single serving-ness of them. That’s why I find them such great reading slump busters. You don’t have to invest yourself in three-hundred pages to get some delicious reading goodness.
Good point, April, and I agree. They do let you get back into slowly. Not to muddy the waters but do you all have thoughts about collections with different authors? That is a variety of short story that I can’t get into. I need some continuity of style or voice, if that makes sense.
I think I’ve only read essays in that style, not fiction, but I’m pretty sure I’d feel the same.
So, readers, where do you fall on the short story spectrum? Do you love anything you can get your hands on or do you have to be coaxed into reading? Is there a specific style you like or do you need your stories to be connected? Do you have any suggestions or recommendations for reluctant readers?
June 15, 2015 at 8:24 am
I enjoy short story collections – but I only read them occasionally. I generally prefer classic authors, but will read modern writers too. One of my all time favorite books is a short story collection – Nine Stories by JD Salinger. My problem is with my memory – I forget huge details and plots of novels I read as time goes on, and so it’s even worse with short story collections – I can read a collection and weeks later have no memory of the stories that were in it. That’s why my favorites seem to be the ones that stand out in my memory, that are so unusual or unique that I think about them long after I read them. Salinger does this, as does George Saunders and F. Scott Fitzgerald. I just read A Good Man is Hard to Find, but I think those stories will stick with me as well. On the flip side, I read “The Doll” – a collection by Daphne du Maurier and remember absolutely nothing about any of the stories.
LikeLike
June 16, 2015 at 9:07 am
I can have the same sort of memory issue. If I read a collection of stories they all melt into one another. I’m learning that I need to take a collection slow. I don’t think they are meant to be read the way one reads a novel. At least they aren’t for me!
LikeLike
June 16, 2015 at 12:12 pm
I like that idea – reading the collection slower and taking time between the stories. I think that would help me out too.
LikeLike
June 15, 2015 at 8:45 am
This is easy for me to declare…I LOVE SHORTS! 🙂 “The Lottery” was the first one I read as a teen that blew my mind and then revisted them a few years ago in between novels. All the above work for me: weird, fantastical, “slices of life”, linked, unlinked…yeah, I’m strange like that. And of course there are some that are totally forgettable. This fondness carries over to essays as well. The reason they work for me is sometimes I just want a story to pack a punch in a few pages. I can read them alongside novels and work on a collection for months. I know The Shore is on the discussion agenda this week and that’s a short collection that I loved as well. I just read The Temple of Air and it felt similar to The Shore…dark and strange.
LikeLike
June 15, 2015 at 9:04 am
I know this girl would love a “best of” list from you, as someone who is just getting into short stories! 🙂
LikeLike
June 16, 2015 at 12:09 am
That’s it, Marisa! You have shamed me into reading The Lottery. No, I have not read it. *hangs head* But I am going to get after it now.
LikeLike
June 16, 2015 at 9:37 am
I’ve The Lottery on the shelf too… dying to dig it out hearing it blew you away!
LikeLike
June 16, 2015 at 9:03 am
You know, I think I like a short story on its own, vs. reading a collection of them. I read The Yellow Wallpaper during the most recent readathon. I absolutely loved it.
Maybe I should take a page from your book (ha ha) and read a collection slowly, alongside whatever else I’m reading.
LikeLike
June 16, 2015 at 9:41 am
I ‘nearly’ always try to fit in one short story a day – not just from one collection but cherrypick from various collections… Seem to appreciate them better this way – able to better digest them as stand one stories
LikeLike
June 15, 2015 at 9:04 am
I’m just starting to get into short story collections, and have enjoyed reading them alongside whatever else I’m reading. I don’t feel like I’ve read enough of them to really be able to evaluate my preferences in terms, of style, cohesiveness, subject matter, and so on. I have a few collections on my shelf, and will now be paying a little more attention to different aspects of short stories.
LikeLike
June 15, 2015 at 9:56 am
Much as I love getting lost in a good novel, over the last few years I’ve also developed a taste for short stories… It began when I was studying Creative Writing as the assignments were to write short pieces so it naturally led me to read a diverse range to see how it’s done well, or not so well. Many say the format provides the writer with opportunities to try new voices, narrative techniques, new genres, new styles & dabble with characters but I think this also applies to the reader – try new experiences without having to invest time in a whole novel.
LikeLike
June 15, 2015 at 10:43 am
That is exactly why I like short stories. A lot of times, I like short stories for reasons that would drive me crazy in a full-length book.
LikeLike
June 15, 2015 at 10:42 am
I like reading short stories. I agree with April that they are good slump busters, and they are also good for when I don’t have all that much time for reading or I want something different. When I read a short story, I want weird and unusual. I want a bumpy ride and an open ending, which is not something I usually enjoy with a full-length book or even novella. That means I actually prefer collections with short stories by different authors, although I am ok with an arc or theme that ties them all together.
LikeLike
June 15, 2015 at 12:06 pm
I love “a bumpy ride and an open ending”, because that’s exactly what I look for. I love that they make me puzzle and think in such a small space.
LikeLike
June 15, 2015 at 11:12 am
I come from a background of sci-fi/fantasy/horror reading where short fiction seems to have a strong pedigree. My early days were populated with Edgar Allan Poe and Arthur Conan Doyle and then Ray Bradbury and Isaac Asimov. I have found that I don’t really like to read collections and anthologies straight through. The stories get all munged together. Which is why a challenge like Deal Me In (one story a week) helps me knock out a couple of collections a year. If anyone is looking to dip into some online fantasy stories for the heck of it: Kelly Link (http://kellylink.net/read-me) and Eugie Foster (http://www.eugiefoster.com/free-fiction) are two of my favorites.
LikeLike
June 15, 2015 at 12:08 pm
I think that trying to read straight through is probably the mistake that many of us make going from novels to short stories. Short stories often need at least a little bit of digestion before moving on and I know I have a hard time letting them settle properly before going to the next.
LikeLike
June 16, 2015 at 12:08 am
I totally forgot Poe! I loved his stories. And Ray Bradbury. Thank you for reminding me. I guess I haven’t been as adverse as I thought I was. Except that i enjoyed those things when I was younger and then my taste moved to longer stories or novels and I left short stories behind.
LikeLike
June 15, 2015 at 11:24 am
I prefer to get lost in something longer, but short stories have their place. My expectations for them are higher, though. I can read an okay novel and enjoy it, but my short stories have to be fantastic.
As for collections, I have only ever read collections by the same author, but am planning to read one by different authors sometime this summer. So, we’ll see how that goes.
LikeLike
June 16, 2015 at 9:16 am
I’ve heard it said, time and time again, that short stories are harder to write. I wonder if it’s because readers expect so much? Or is it because and author only has so much space in which to make an impact, build characters, tell an entire story? I think I’ve answered my own question, lol.
LikeLike
June 16, 2015 at 9:52 am
I’ve heard that, too, and I can see why!
LikeLike
June 15, 2015 at 11:57 am
I’ve historically had trouble with short fiction stories (but I love non-fiction essay collections). Mostly I’m “eh” or really liked one or two, but didn’t feel like reading the rest in the collection were worth it. I’ve liked stand-alone short stories or novellas better, like Night Flight (de Saint-Exupéry) and The Fifth Child (Lessing). But I’ve recently read a couple of collections that I enjoyed (Atwood’s Stone Mattress, Mayhew Bergman’s Almost Famous Women) which makes me want to try more. I have a copy of Kelly Link’s Get in Trouble I’m looking forward to reading this summer.
LikeLike
June 15, 2015 at 7:40 pm
Oh, we didn’t talk about the inconsistency of collections, but that’s a problem I’ve run into, too. I hate that feeling of *loving* a few stories and just hanging on through the rest. But I totally agree with you on the ones that have worked for you – they’re really strong!
LikeLike
June 15, 2015 at 12:02 pm
I’ve always had a problem with shorts. I realize it’s MY problem connecting. Now that I’ve stated that, JENNIFER – I had the same reaction to Butler’s new work being shorts, but I loved them. In the end I wasn’t disappointed at all, so I hope you give them a shot.
I have a hard time even pinning down what collections work for me. I don’t require a theme or connectivity. I’m not much for magical realism or far out themes. And the kicker is my sweet spot for a book is between 200-300 pages. You’d think I would have a natural affinity for the short.
I’m getting better. I’m not sure that means it’s a learned like or whether I’m just getting better at picking things that work. Or that I’m just trying more, so more things are working. It’s interesting several of you touted Tenth of December as a collection that got you into shorts, as I’m not sure I even made it through one or two stories.
That may be part of the issue. Because they are so short, they have less of a chance of connection with a larger audience. Dunno. I know when I connect with a story it’s a fantastic feeling, hence my continued efforts. I just wish I could better understand what IT is that gets me.
LikeLike
June 16, 2015 at 9:13 am
You all are doing Butler a big solid here. 😀 It’s official, I’m going to give his new collection a whirl. Maybe I’ll do what I talked about in another comment and read it alongside whatever novel I’m reading.
LikeLike
June 16, 2015 at 9:45 am
That would work with the collection as they’re not specifically tied together. I’ll be curious to see if you do it that way or are sucked in. 🙂 Just glad you’re going to give it a whirl! Now the pressure is on us recommenders.
LikeLike
June 15, 2015 at 12:27 pm
Jennifer – I do not read short stories. I have never liked them. I think because I need more time to get invested in the characters and have a horrible book memory, so keeping track of tons of different plots and characters in one book can get overwhelming. BUT – I tried Butler’s Beneath the Bonfire b/c I loved S.L. so much. I figured if anyone could make me love short stories, he could. And – I LOVED it. It’s one of my favorite books of 2015 so far! It has a very similar feel to S.L.: Wisconson plays a big role tying everything together and he does have central themes of old friends and male friendships in particular. And – there is a good dose of crazy…more than in S.L. I’d definitely give it a shot since you loved S.L.
LikeLike
June 16, 2015 at 9:11 am
I really did love Shotgun Lovesongs. I loved the setting most of all. (Wisconsin, hooray!) I’m glad to hear you say that you loved his new collection. If it has the same Midwestern flavor as SL I’m definitely more likely to pick it up.Thank you!
LikeLike
June 15, 2015 at 12:54 pm
I really like short stories but they need to be done well. There is a real skill to them I think. I’m currently reading Alice Munro and am amazed at how quickly I get drawn in to each story. I didn’t really read collections of short stories until a few years ago but now I look out for them
LikeLike
June 16, 2015 at 7:19 pm
Alice Munro has got some wonderful collections! Someone gave me one of her books and I was blown away!
LikeLike
June 15, 2015 at 8:32 pm
I understand the gripes behind the short story, but I always encourage people to just TRY it. Because you never know how you’ll react to a short story! Personally, I LOVE me some short stories! There is something very comforting about being able to finish one, move on, and on, and on 🙂 I love how in a short span of a few pages that a coherent story comes together so quickly — it takes a whole other mindset to be able to produce a good one so I am always amazed at how authors do it. For example, you all probably know that Gabriel Garcia Marquez’s 100 Years or Solitude is long an involved but he also wrote Strange Pilgrims and other short stories collections which are very different from his 100 Years. Haruki Murakami is the same — he had these huge novels but he comes out with short story collections, some stories which are further developed into the full blown novel.
LikeLike
June 15, 2015 at 8:36 pm
I was definitely in the do-not-like camp up until a few years ago. I think the abrupt switch in narrators, plots, etc put me off. Now I do read more. They feel more like little accomplishments. I like if they have a similar theme or if the author’s voice is consistent. Some of my favorites, besides Shirley Jackson, are Daphne du Maurier, Yoko Ogawa (Revenge), and Margaret Atwood’s latest (Stone Mattress). I think authors can take more risks in short fiction. They don’t always have the arc a novel has and can be really unexpected and strange.
LikeLike
June 15, 2015 at 9:12 pm
Well, call me frugal because I’m one who wants my $$ worth. Now, this is going to sound very contradictory, I know. I really loved Shirley Jackson’s The Lottery and used it in the classroom for a number of years because of my own selfish love for it. I have read short stories in anthologies that I loved, but they left me hungry for more. I know this makes no sense really because I’ll pay novel prices for a novella, but I’m one who looks at page count and won’t pay book prices for individual short stories. Perhaps, I’m just a page count snob or short story snob? I’m ashamed to say that I’ve even bought serials, but find it so difficult to commit to a short story. Definitely, I must be a short story snob. *sigh*
LikeLike
June 17, 2015 at 11:07 am
I absolutely love short stories. The digestible length is certainly a perk, but even more so, I enjoy the feel you can get for an author’s voice within a short story collection. In a novel, it’s sometimes difficult to distinguish the author from the characters, while common threads between short stories often reveal more of the author.
Two collections that exemplify this are Jhumpa Lahiri’s The Interpreter of Maladies, and Music Through the Floor, by Eric Puchner. (My favorite story from the latter is “Essay #3: Leda and the Swan.”)
LikeLike
June 18, 2015 at 5:29 pm
I was trying to think of the last collection of shorts that I’ve read and SMH! I JUST finished the Portable Dorothy Parker. She is just SO good. Biting and snarky and spot-on social commentary; they stand the test of time. I highly recommend. I also think this was the first time I had listened to short stories (audiobook) but that was to make the poetry digestible.
I usually prefer a collection be themed or with a central character, like Olive Kittridge or Tom Rachman’s The Imperfectionists.
Thank you all, I’m excited to put a few of these collections mentioned here on my tbr.
LikeLike
June 21, 2015 at 6:36 pm
I have a few problems with short stories. If they’re not all by the same author, I don’t every like all of them. While with a single book, I can read a few pages and be pretty sure about whether or not I’m going to like the book enough to read, I find it impossible to avoid some short stories I don’t like. I also think they’re particularly hard to write well, with we’ll for me messaging that they feel complete and got me invested in the story. This often doesn’t happen for me. I haven’t written off short stories entirely, but like Jennifer, it takes a lot to convince me to pick them up.
LikeLike