I just finished re-reading To Kill a Mockingbird for the first time since…high school, I think. I might have read it once more since then, but it’s definitely been at least ten years. One of the things that stood out to me right away was how self-assured and even feminist Scout’s voice is.
For some reason, I feel like I remember the Boo storyline much more than Tom Robinson’s. I’m not sure if it’s because it was more interesting to me at the time I read it or if the white suburban high school I went to didn’t really want to tackle race.
I re-read To Kill a Mockingbird last year so I didn’t feel the need to re-read again so soon. Scout is the perfect narrator in my eyes. She’s my benchmark, the ultimate literary character that I hold all other characters up to.
Scout’s voice is amazing and underrated as one of the feminists in our literary canon.
I read To Kill a Mockingbird for the very first time about six months before I started law school (I knew I was about to start law school). I somehow missed out on it during the high school required reading circuit and the impact that it had on me at that time was immeasurable.
I read it for the second time right as I was about the graduate law school (about three years later) and while it read differently for me, it was still quite powerful. Now as I read it for a third time, working as a prosecutor (the opposite job that Atticus Finch does) it means something different again for me, but still incredibly important.
Like April, I missed out on this during high school. I read it for the first time last October and was blown away. It’s stuck with me so vividly, I don’t feel the need for a re-read before Watchman is released, but I loved it enough that I’m sure it will be read again and again throughout my life (and re-reads are rare for me!).
The first chapter of Go Set a Watchman was released last week and made me realize something I hadn’t thought too much about.
There is going to be endless criticism of this book. Not just reviews, but sentence-by-sentence think pieces, rants and raves, etc. and it started on Twitter the moment that chapter was released. I couldn’t even enjoy reading it because my feed was cluttered with the thoughts of so many people. I know how the internet works, so I realize I don’t have to have Twitter open…I just wish things like this didn’t have to be analyzed on the spot. We have plans to discuss the book here on The Socratic Salon next month—so, hey irony!—but I can’t help wishing I could read it in a bubble.
It’d be easier to be read in a bubble if places like the New York Times didn’t put spoilers IN THE TITLE of their review, which means it’s also part of the link (we’ll still link up in case you’re interested). Was I the only one who felt like that was a jerk move? To me, that felt like a huge spoiler.
I don’t think I’m even going to read the first chapter beforehand. I just want to read the book in its entirety, like it was any other book. (Although I don’t remember the last time I was nervous about a book release!)
I know there’s kind of this backlash against spoiler warnings right now and a sense that they’re unnecessary, especially when it comes to TV and Twitter (which I actually understand—television shows are at most an hour long), but I feel like books are different. I don’t know why common courtesy seems to be out the window with this one. It’s just frustrating to think that someone who doesn’t grab the book tomorrow and immediately sit down to read will likely walk into a minefield of analysis by the end of the day. I hope I’m wrong.
[claps hands over ears] I didn’t see the article and I’m not going to. I’m going to be on radio silence until I finish Watchman, so sorry, darlings. The good news is that I should finish it quickly. I decided to re-read To Kill a Mockingbird Sunday and I finished it that day. I’m going to ignore all the shennanigans until I finish the book. Wishful thinking?
I’m wishfully thinking right beside you. I’d really like to read, and hopefully enjoy, Go Set a Watchman on its own. I don’t want everyone’s Twitter commentary in my head. I don’t want the usual suspects to parse every word for me. I’m nervous enough about this book without hearing everyone’s thoughts, criticisms, and opinions in my head. This is one of those times that I regret social media’s existence. Call me a Luddite. I won’t mind.
Yes, we will eventually discuss Go Set a Watchman here on The Socratic Salon. Hopefully you’ll be able to read the book on your own, instead of through spoilers on Twitter.
How are you feeling about all of this, readers? Have you re-read To Kill a Mockingbird? What stood out to you? Do you plan to read Go Set a Watchman? What are your expectations?
July 13, 2015 at 12:43 am
I have not had time to reread TKaM yet, and though I have pre-ordered GSaW, I probably won’t have time to read them both until a week after the release. I always try to avoid reading much about a book before reading it anyway, so I will continue that lack of preparation with this one. I think I don’t understand being anxious about a book release…it’s a book, another book among many. Granted it is an amazing literary addition, no matter how it’s written, but it is a book. To be read. To be enjoyed. To be internalized within each of our souls however we interpret and resonate with it. I’m excited!
LikeLike
July 13, 2015 at 8:42 am
I read the first chapter of Watchman really early that Friday morning, but when I opened the NY Post Sunday edition…just like the Times…there was a huge first chapter spoiler splashed all over the page!
But, that’s a good point about spoilers about the entire book being all over Twitter by the end of the day. I hadn’t thought about that. And – it kind of reminds me of the way I was during the London Olympics…trying to avoid FB and Twitter until the NBC night broadcast, only to inadvertently see some ticker scroll on ESPN while at the gym (I know, this is weird, but I’m a huge Olympics fan). Grr…
I almost feel a pressure to drop the book I’m currently reading and immediately pick up Watchman tomorrow just so it’s not ruined for me, but I’d really rather read it in my own time.
LikeLike
July 13, 2015 at 10:37 am
I saw things from the very first paragraph parsed and criticized and blerg. My eyes were rolling and my attitude was grumptastic, lol.
Maybe I’ll read it right away and hope against hope to miss some of the spoilers. Maybe I’ll put it off for a year to avoid the hype. I haven’t made up my mind quite yet.
LikeLike
July 13, 2015 at 8:51 am
I’ve also seen some spoiler headlines here in Australia thanks to newspapers and social media. I decided not to read the first chapter in the paper and I’m still trying to work out when or if I will even read the book….
LikeLike
July 13, 2015 at 10:36 am
I’m with you. I fully expected to read it as soon as it hit the shelves but now I’m really wondering about what to do. That’s probably because I’m extremely cranky about the spoilers? When it comes out tomorrow maybe some of my crankiness will have gone away and I’ll pick it up and start reading. Time will tell! 😀
LikeLike
July 13, 2015 at 9:03 am
I’m so unsure about whether or not I even want to read it at this point. I’m closing my eyes and pretending it doesn’t exist unless the general consensus is that it should be read … I just have such a bad feeling about it. It’s been a while since I’ve read TKAM though – I think I’ve only read it once, in college. So all of this craziness has at least inspired me to do a long overdue re-read, but I’m in no rush to pick up GSAW.
LikeLike
July 15, 2015 at 8:19 pm
I’m the same way. I am going to let the craziness die down and I guess I’ll get around to it, bad feeling or not.
LikeLike
July 13, 2015 at 10:19 am
I’m not planning to read GSAW, at least not any time soon, but I totally agree about spoilers and common courtesy. Luckily the books I typically read aren’t big hyped titles, so I usually don’t have to worry so much about spoilers.
Just for comparison’s sake, I didn’t read the HP series until the seventh book was released, but this was before the bookternet exploded – or at least before I was on it – so I actually managed not to have any of the previous books spoiled for me. I feel like that would never happen now.
LikeLike
July 13, 2015 at 12:56 pm
I didn’t read HP until about three years ago and I was pretty well protected from spoilers. I was wondering about that, though…whether a big book like those would get a similar treatment online today. I guess we’ll be able to see when the next Game of Thrones book comes out? That’s the closest comparison I can think of. Still, I saw these spoilers on CNN this morning…it just seems so unnecessary.
LikeLike
July 13, 2015 at 11:20 am
My real life book club is doing TKAM in September and I wasn’t planning on rereading it till then. Then I realized GSAW stuff is going to be everywhere and if I don’t read it right away I will be spoiled, so I moved up my reread to last week.
I also hadn’t read it since high school, grade 9 actually, and that’s much more than 10 years for me! I was shocked at how little Boo Radley is really in the book. With like 20 pages left and still no sign of him, I wondered how I could have misremembered his role. Does anyone remember if they made his part larger in the movie?
I was also pretty impressed with the positive/progressive attitude of race by Atticus and a few others and how negative and ridiculous the others were portrayed. I know that was the point of the book but race relations in the U.S. South in the early 1960’s was not so progressive. And at the actual time frame of the book, the depression era ’30’s, even less so.
LikeLike
July 13, 2015 at 12:53 pm
Oh, that’s a good question about the movie – I’ve definitely seen it more recently than the last time I read the book, but I can’t remember if Boo is more of a focus.
LikeLike
July 13, 2015 at 12:58 pm
I have to give it to Buzzfeed. They just posted “The Most Shocking Twists from Go Set a Watchman”…and I was prepared to be pretty livid. But they’re things like “Sheriff Heck Tate is now running for mayor with the slogan ‘He’d Be a Heck of a Mayor!'”
LikeLike
July 13, 2015 at 1:43 pm
I agree with the spoilers in the title. What’s up with that? I’m reading it because curiosity will kill me if I don’t. If it ruins To Kill a Mockingbird for me, I’ll just have to join the rest of the world. TKAM is in my top 5 all time favorites.
LikeLike
July 13, 2015 at 3:07 pm
I am avoiding everything written about this novel. I heard one tiny thing that Atticus Finch is “troublesome” in this book and it freaked me out. Primarily because my little boy is named after Atticus Finch. What if Atticus Finch is an a-hole or has a basement of dead bodies or something else awful? ::hyperventilates in a bag::
LikeLike
July 13, 2015 at 3:57 pm
I thought of you this morning when I saw an article title about how nervous parents who’ve named their kids Atticus must be (I didn’t click through!).
LikeLike
July 13, 2015 at 10:31 pm
You’re hilarious.
LikeLike
July 15, 2015 at 8:18 pm
Oh my. I would be stressing too hhahaha
LikeLike
July 13, 2015 at 3:27 pm
I knew spoilers would not be avoidable with this. The book and the controversy surrounding its publication are just too huge. I still felt like the NYT headline hit me over the head unnecessarily hard. The good thing? This one spoiler has only strengthened my resolve NOT to read Watchman. Now all I have to do is try to not let the endless commentary that is sure to come spoil TKAM for me. I read it last year for the first time, and I want to keep its perfection (in my mind) for as long as I can.
LikeLike
July 13, 2015 at 5:29 pm
I haven’t re-read TKAM to prep for Go Set a Watchman…yet. It’s in the pile! I’m conflicted about even reading GSAW because of all the controversy surrounding it’s publication. Did Harper Lee mean for it to be published? Is she totally ok with this? Is she being taken advantage of? I may wait for a library copy to find me…
That said I’m excited to re-read TKAM. I don’t remember a lot about the actual book at this point (it’s been like 15 years since I read it) but I remember reading it and realizing how big this book was, how important. I’m looking forward to seeing what I think now!
LikeLike
July 13, 2015 at 6:15 pm
I am SO angry over the spoiler issue. After reading the NYT review, I was FURIOUS that it was thrown out there. LET. ME. FIND. OUT. FOR. MYSELF. Then, Mashable got in on it, then several news sites were talking about it. I put on my blinders and moved along, but the damage was already done. I’m immediately diverting my attention at any news postings or commercials about GSaW. My copy comes tomorrow, along with the rest of the nation’s, but I won’t get to read it until next week. I will say that my heart rate dropped a bit at the sentence concerning Jem in the first chapter. I had to take a deep breath after that one because my first thought was that I wasn’t sure I wanted to read the book if it Jem was…well, you know. Then, I palm-slapped my forehead because I knew it will have a lot of flashbacks.
I didn’t re-read TKaM but did skim it a little. I’ve read it every year and listened to the audiobook every year with my classes, so I didn’t see the need to use time that could be spent in another book on one I feel as if I know like the back of my hand, even if it is one of my favorites of all time.
LikeLike
July 13, 2015 at 6:32 pm
I hope you’ll come back to our Watchman discussion and tell us how you think it will change the way TKAM is taught. I think that’s one of the biggest questions I have, even though I haven’t read the book yet. I’m really curious if Watchman will be seen as outside the canon and TKAM will be taught as usual or if these future lives will have to be considered, too.
LikeLike
July 13, 2015 at 7:05 pm
That’s a really good question. My school system has to approve anything that is taught, but with today’s racial unrest, I wonder how it will be viewed as far as being placed on the approved list.
LikeLike
July 13, 2015 at 10:15 pm
I’ll read it!! Can’t wait to pick mine up this weekend! I’m actually going on a road trip and picking mine up in Monroeville. I.Am.So.Excited. Hadn’t thought about going radio silent til finishing it but I think that is a great idea.
I have every confidence that I will love this book, regardless of flaws. I’m not hard to please, but I don’t know if I could love it more than TKaM anyway. That is one of the FEW books that I ever re-read. It’s like in my top three ever.
LikeLike
July 21, 2015 at 5:11 pm
I’m #563 on a list for Watchman at the library. Ha. It must be doing something right. I’ll get it before then. I’m not worried about the general spoilers on this book that the NYT wrote about in its review on Friday — give me a break. Those are so broad. What I want to read Watchman for is her writing … and her insights or views on that world. To get behind Scout …
LikeLike